Earth at night with secure data routes connecting global cities
    Back to Services

    Tatva Unified Operations & Cyber Defence Platform

    One integrated view of infrastructure health, vulnerabilities and cyber threats - built on Zabbix, Greenbone and Wazuh, with an AI-assisted correlation layer and human decision-making retained.

    Last Updated:
    Security, observability and vulnerability management - working together

    Three disciplines, one operating model

    Most organisations run monitoring, vulnerability management and security operations as separate practices with separate consoles, separate teams and separate reporting. The same outage, the same unpatched host and the same suspicious login are investigated three times. Tatva Networks integrates these platforms through APIs, connectors, webhooks and shared workflows, then adds an AI-assisted correlation layer so infrastructure health, exposure and threat activity are understood together.

    Technology roles

    What each platform contributes

    Zabbix - observability

    Collects health, performance and capacity telemetry from infrastructure, networks, applications, cloud platforms, containers, databases, services, IoT devices and OT environments.

    Greenbone - vulnerability management

    Discovers and assesses vulnerabilities across the estate, maintains risk visibility and re-validates remediation on a continuous cycle.

    Wazuh - SIEM and XDR

    Provides endpoint visibility, log analytics, threat detection, compliance monitoring and incident response data across servers, endpoints and cloud workloads.

    Tatva AI layer - correlation and orchestration

    Correlates events from all three platforms, removes duplicate noise, adds context, scores risk, prioritises incidents, recommends remediation and drafts technical and executive reports for human review.

    Architecture

    How data flows through the platform

    Zabbix, Greenbone and Wazuh stay separate products. Tatva integrates them through APIs, connectors and shared workflows, and adds one correlation layer above them. Decisions stay with your analysts and engineers.

    How data flows through the platformArchitecture diagram: network, asset and host telemetry feed Zabbix, Greenbone and Wazuh; their findings flow into Tatva's AI-assisted correlation layer, which hands prioritised cases to SOC and NOC analysts and tickets and KPIs to ITSM and management dashboards.ESTATE · TELEMETRY SOURCESDETECTION PLATFORMS · OPEN SOURCEOPERATIONS · CONSUMERSSNMP · SYSLOG · NETFLOWSCAN RESULTS · CVEAGENT LOGS · FIMAVAILABILITY · METRICSVULNERABILITIESALERTS · EVENTSPRIORITISED CASESTICKETS · KPIsNETNetwork & infrastructureswitches · firewalls · SD-WANASSETAsset inventoryIP ranges · cloud · OT · IoTHOSTEndpoints, servers & cloudagents · apps · identityMONITORZabbixobservability · NOCSCANGreenbonevulnerability managementSIEMWazuhSIEM · XDR · MITRE ATT&CKTATVA LAYERAI-assisted correlation & orchestrationdedupe · enrich · risk-score · recommend — analysts decideOPSSOC & NOC analystsL1 triage · L2/L3 investigation · huntsMGMTITSM & management dashboardsServiceNow · Jira · exec reportingLEGENDTelemetry sourcePlatform (integrated via API)Tatva correlation layerRaw telemetryFindingsPrimary output

    Zabbix, Greenbone and Wazuh are separate platforms. Tatva Networks integrates them through APIs, connectors, webhooks and shared workflows rather than presenting them as one native product.

    Integrated workflow

    From asset discovery to verified, reported closure

    Step 01

    Discover assets

    Build and maintain an inventory across infrastructure, endpoints, network, cloud, applications, OT and IoT.

    Step 02

    Monitor health

    Zabbix tracks availability, performance and capacity for every monitored service.

    Step 03

    Identify vulnerabilities

    Greenbone scans and assesses exposure on a scheduled, authenticated basis.

    Step 04

    Detect threats

    Wazuh analyses logs and endpoint telemetry against tuned detection rules.

    Step 05

    Correlate risk

    The AI layer links health, exposure and threat signals for the same assets.

    Step 06

    Prioritise response

    Incidents are ranked by business impact and routed to SOC, NOC or IT operations.

    Step 07

    Remediate

    Agreed playbooks and change processes drive containment and fixes.

    Step 08

    Verify

    Re-scanning and re-monitoring confirm the issue is genuinely closed.

    Step 09

    Report

    Technical and executive reporting closes the loop with evidence.

    AI-assisted operations

    What the AI layer does - and what it does not

    The AI layer supports analysts and engineers with correlation, prioritisation, investigation, recommendations and reporting. It does not make security or operational decisions without human oversight.

    Alert deduplication

    Repeated and related signals are collapsed into a single actionable item.

    Event correlation

    Health, vulnerability and threat events about the same asset are linked together.

    Risk scoring

    Exposure, asset criticality and detection activity are combined into one priority view.

    Root-cause assistance

    Supporting evidence and probable-cause hypotheses are assembled for the engineer.

    Vulnerability prioritisation

    Remediation order reflects exploitability and business exposure, not severity alone.

    Incident summaries

    Timeline, affected assets and actions taken are drafted automatically for review.

    Remediation recommendations

    Suggested next steps are proposed; approval and execution stay with your team.

    Capacity forecasting

    Trend analysis flags where compute, storage or bandwidth will constrain services.

    Executive reporting

    Operational data is summarised into risk and service reporting for leadership.

    Natural-language search

    Teams can query operational data conversationally, with sources shown.

    Who consumes the output

    One platform, several audiences

    SOC team

    Prioritised, enriched security incidents with supporting telemetry.

    NOC team

    Correlated infrastructure and network events with probable cause.

    IT operations

    Capacity, patching and remediation work queued with business context.

    Management dashboard

    Service health, risk posture and trend reporting for leadership.

    Incident and service management

    Cases raised into existing ITSM workflows with agreed fields and ownership.

    Business outcomes

    Why organisations integrate rather than add another tool

    One operational picture

    SOC, NOC and IT operations work from the same asset, health, exposure and threat data.

    Less duplicated effort

    The same incident is not investigated separately by two teams in two consoles.

    Risk-based prioritisation

    Work is ordered by combined business exposure rather than by tool-specific severity.

    Faster triage

    Context is assembled before an engineer opens the case.

    Evidence for audit

    Monitoring, vulnerability and incident records are retained and reportable.

    Human accountability

    AI assists analysis and reporting; people approve decisions and actions.

    Frequently asked questions

    No. They are three separate open platforms with distinct purposes. Tatva Networks integrates and manages them through APIs, connectors, webhooks, shared workflows and a unified operational model so the output behaves as one service.

    No. It deduplicates, correlates, scores, prioritises, recommends and reports. Analysts and engineers review and decide. Automated actions only run where you have approved a bounded, auditable playbook.

    Yes. The platform can be deployed on-premises, in private or sovereign cloud, or in a hybrid arrangement, depending on data residency and operational requirements.

    Yes. Many customers start with observability or vulnerability management and add detection and correlation later. The integration model is designed to be built up in stages.

    Not by default. Where an existing platform already does the job, we integrate with it. Replacement is only proposed where there is a clear operational or cost justification.

    See infrastructure health, exposure and threats in one view

    We will assess what you already run, map the integration points and propose a staged path to unified operations.

    Request a Consultation